<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Mormon Life - Pop Culture tag</title>
    <link>http://www.mormonlife.com/tag/Pop%20Culture</link>
    <description>Mormon Life - Pop Culture tag</description>
    <atom:link href="http://www.mormonlife.com/rss/tag/Pop%20Culture" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
  
    <item>
      <title>Geek chic and the Mormon Moment</title>
      <link>http://www.mormonlife.com/story/67401-geek-chic-and-the-mormon-moment</link>
      <guid>http://www.mormonlife.com/story/67401-geek-chic-and-the-mormon-moment</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 07:43:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <description>
      &lt;div&gt;

source: slate.com
&lt;/div&gt;


	&lt;i class=&quot;ml_blurb&quot;&gt;Mormon Life says: There really is something adorkable about Mormons, and now being geeky is mainstream cool.&lt;/i&gt;


Among the various figures and phenomena contributing to the so-called “Mormon moment”—Big Love, Mitt Romney, Glenn Beck, the Book of Mormon musical, Stephenie Meyer—one plausible factor has, so far as I can tell, not previously been noticed: the triumph of geek culture.
&lt;p&gt;
That geekiness has, in some sense, triumphed, does not seem to be in dispute. The term “geek chic” became common in the 1990s; USA Today, not generally on the forefront of such things, used the term as a headline for a piece about how geeks have “pulled ahead of the rest of us” in 2003. In December 2010, Patton Oswalt published a much discussed piece in Wired (covering all things nerdy since 1993) arguing that geek culture had succeeded so totally as to become worthless.&lt;/p&gt;

      </description>
    </item>
  
  </channel>
</rss>

